Memphis Standard

The Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) has been the subject of scrutiny and misinformation, particularly from major technology companies. A recent statement seeks to clarify several aspects of the bill, emphasizing that it does not infringe on free speech or expand governmental powers.

According to the statement, KOSA "would not censor, limit, or remove any content from the internet" and does not empower the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) or state attorneys general to initiate lawsuits over content or speech. The bill is described as content-neutral and maintains existing protections under Section 230 for online platforms regarding third-party content.

The statement further asserts that KOSA does not increase federal authority. It claims there is no new rulemaking power granted to the FTC nor any ability to regulate online content. Instead, it provides "clear direction from Congress about how to apply its existing enforcement authorities to protect kids online."

The duty of care outlined in KOSA holds social media platforms accountable for their product designs and business practices. The legislation aims to prevent specific harms to children such as suicide and sexual predation, with these harms being defined by Congress.

KOSA also addresses concerns about age verification requirements. The statement clarifies that "KOSA does not impose age verification requirements or require platforms to collect more data about users." Non-profit organizations, blogs, personal websites, news outlets, churches, and broadband companies are reportedly unaffected by this legislation.

Additionally, a Kids Online Safety Council will be established where parents can engage with tech companies on issues affecting their children without having rulemaking or enforcement powers.

Lastly, KOSA aligns with existing methods used by entities like the military in defining mental health disorders through standards set by documents such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM).

In summary, while Big Tech has raised alarms about potential impacts of KOSA on free speech and privacy rights, proponents argue that these claims are unfounded misrepresentations aimed at hindering legislative progress designed to safeguard children online.